Explainer page

How the TRT Curve & E2 Calculator Works

This page explains (1) how the calculator turns your inputs into curves, and (2) what the science actually supports—including where the model is solid, where it’s simplified, and why calibration matters.

Contents

High-level: what the calculator is doing Change log Inputs → outputs: what each control changes The math (complete, with formulas) Testosterone ester pharmacokinetics (what science says) IM vs SubQ: absorption differences Lab timing & steady state (what guidelines say) Estradiol science: aromatase, body fat, genetics, AI Enhanced compounds (Primo, Mast, EQ) hCG science (what evidence supports) Limitations & how to use this safely References (high-quality sources)

High-level: what the calculator is doing

In one sentence
The calculator treats each injection as a slow-release depot, predicts a testosterone curve using a standard pharmacokinetic shape, then estimates estradiol as a scaled fraction of testosterone that’s modified by body fat, genetics, AI, and calibration.

Step 1 — Testosterone curve

  • It creates an injection schedule (e.g., every 3.5 days).
  • For each injection, it uses a classic first-order absorption + first-order elimination model (the Bateman function), with route-aware absorption (IM baseline, SubQ modestly slower) and optional component release lag for depot behavior.
  • It sums the contribution of all injections to get the total curve, while skipping contributions older than ~7 effective half-lives for performance.
  • It converts the model output to the familiar unit ng/dL using an empirical scale factor (85.0), and adjusts for body weight (a rough proxy for distribution volume).

Step 2 — Estradiol curve

  • Estradiol (E2) is estimated as: E2 ≈ Testosterone × ratio.
  • The ratio is modified by:
    • Sex mode (sex-specific baseline conversion settings and risk-zone thresholds)
    • Body fat (higher fat → higher aromatase activity → higher E2 tendency)
    • Genetics toggles (a simplified “conversion” + “SHBG tendency” phenotype)
    • AI multiplier (None / Mild / Moderate / High = simple multiplicative reduction)
    • Enhanced compounds (Primo / EQ mild-moderate lowering, Mast minimal direct lowering)
    • Responder (a manual sensitivity dial)
  • An optional “variability” switch adds small deterministic noise to mimic day-to-day biological variation.

Step 3 — Calibration (personalization)

Calibration lets you anchor the model to your own lab results. It computes two key personal factors:

  • Testosterone response factor = (your lab T) ÷ (model T at the same timing)
  • E2 ratio = (your lab E2) ÷ (your lab T)

Important: “Optimal / High / Excessive / Crash risk” labels in the E2 panel are heuristic risk buckets based on the simulated average E2—not clinical diagnoses. Use the curve for pattern recognition, then confirm with symptoms + labs.

Change log

Inputs → outputs: what each control changes

Ester

Esters mainly change how quickly testosterone is released from the injection site. Single-esters use one absorption constant (ka), while Sustanon is modeled as a weighted 4-component blend (each component with its own ka and active ratio).

Ester (model) Active ratio ka (1/day) Lag (days) ke (1/day) Implied half‑life (days)
Propionate 0.84 0.850 0 1.0 0.8
Enanthate 0.72 0.150 0 1.0 4.6
Cypionate 0.70 Blend** 0.6 1.0 8.0
Sustanon 250 (blend) 0.70* Blend** 0 to 6 1.0 ~8.7***
Undecanoate (Tea seed) 0.63 0.033 4 1.0 21.0
Undecanoate (Castor) 0.63 0.020 5 1.0 34.7

Active ratio means “how many mg of testosterone base are in 1 mg of ester.” This helps translate mg injected into mg testosterone released.

* Sustanon active ratio is the weighted blend average in this model.
** Blend ka values in this model:
  • Cypionate: early 0.50 + depot 0.087 (with a 0.6 day release lag).
  • Sustanon: propionate 0.85, phenylpropionate 0.35, isocaproate 0.08, decanoate 0.03 (1/day), with delayed decanoate release (up to 6 days).
*** Terminal half-life shown from the slowest blend component in the model.

Sex mode & starting profiles

Dose & frequency

Injection route (IM vs SubQ)

Route changes the effective absorption constant: SubQ uses a modestly reduced ka, which usually lowers peaks and raises troughs at the same weekly load.

Weight

Weight is used as a rough volume proxy: heavier body mass → larger distribution volume → slightly lower concentration for the same released amount (a simplification).

Body fat, genetics, AI, responder

These primarily affect E2 prediction. The calculator is explicit about this: the testosterone curve is PK‑driven, while E2 is a scaled transform of testosterone.

Enhanced compounds (TRT++)

Primo, EQ, and Mast are implemented as dose-aware E2 pressure modifiers. They are directional and heuristic, and intentionally conservative.

Scenarios and compare mode

You can save full protocol snapshots to local storage and overlay a selected scenario as a dashed comparison curve for both T and E2 charts.

hCG toggle

When enabled, the model adds a small constant testosterone “boost” based on weekly IU using a Hill‑curve (a simplified dose–response).

The math (complete, with formulas)

1) Single injection: Bateman function

The model uses a one‑compartment system with first‑order absorption (ka) and first‑order elimination (ke). For a single injection at time 0, the shape is:

C(t) ∝ (Dose · ka / (ke − ka)) · (e^(−ka·t) − e^(−ke·t))    for t ≥ 0

This is the classic “Bateman function,” commonly used for oral drugs but also a good first approximation for depot/absorption‑limited injections.

2) Multiple injections: superposition

For injections at times ti:

Total(t) = Σ C(t − ti − Lag_i) over all injections ti ≤ t

For performance, contributions older than ~7 effective half-lives are skipped (remaining amount is less than 1%).

2b) Sustanon blend superposition

For each injection j at time tj and component i in {prop, phenylprop, isocaproate, decanoate}:

Dose_i = Dose_total × Fraction_i × ActiveRatio_i

Sustanon_Total(t) = Σj Σi Bateman(t − tj − Lag_i, Dose_i, ka_i_effective, ke)
Sustanon fractions used:
propionate 12%, phenylpropionate 24%, isocaproate 24%, decanoate 40%

3) Route-aware absorption and release lag

ka_effective = ka_ester × RouteFactor

RouteFactor = 1.00 (IM), 0.83 (SubQ)

For Sustanon, RouteFactor is applied per component (ka_i_effective = ka_i × RouteFactor).

For formulations with delayed release, each component can use a lag:

Bateman_input_time = t − ti − Lag_i

In the current model this is used for cypionate (short depot lag), Sustanon decanoate (later tail contribution), and undecanoate oils.

4) Converting to ng/dL (the pragmatic step)

The model output is scaled into typical lab units with an empirical factor (VOLUME_FACTOR) and an optional calibration multiplier:

Testosterone_ng/dL(t) = Total(t) · VOLUME_FACTOR · WeightFactor · Calibration_T

5) Estradiol simulation (full multiplier model)

E2_pg/mL(t) = Testosterone_ng/dL(t)
             × [BaseRatio × FatRel × GeneRel × AI × Responder × SexAromatase × CompoundMod]
FatMod(f) = min(2.5, 0.8 + 0.03 × max(0, f − 10)^1.2)

If calibrated and enabled:
  FatRel  = FatMod(current) / FatMod(calibration_fat)
  GeneRel = GeneMult(current) / GeneMult(calibration_genetics)

If standard mode:
  FatRel  = FatMod(current)
  GeneRel = GeneMult(current)
SexAromatase = 1.00 (male), 1.16 (female)

6) Enhanced compounds modifier

CompoundMod = max(0.55, 1 − PrimoDrop − EQDrop − MastDrop)

PrimoDrop = min(0.22, PrimoDose_mg_per_week / 2600) if enabled else 0
EQDrop    = min(0.18, EQDose_mg_per_week / 3300) if enabled else 0
MastDrop  = min(0.05, MastDose_mg_per_week / 6000) if enabled else 0

BaseRatio defaults by sex mode (male/female presets), but calibration sets it to labE2 / labT so future simulations start from your measured conversion ratio.

7) Calibration details (exactly what the tool does)

8) Female HRT-oriented starting profile

Female mode now opens with an HRT-oriented starter profile to avoid male-dose defaults being applied accidentally.

Female starter profile (UI defaults when switching to Female):
- Injection method: SubQ
- Dose: 8 mg
- Frequency: every 7 days
- Weight: 65 kg
- Body fat: 28%
- Ester: cypionate

Male starting values are intentionally unchanged.

Testosterone ester pharmacokinetics (what science says)

Big idea: injectable esters behave like a depot. The ester chain length + oil vehicle slow release, so serum testosterone rises after injection and then declines gradually. Peaks and troughs can be large with weekly/biweekly enanthate/cypionate schedules. citeturn12view2

Half-life varies by ester and oil

Why “ka” matters more than “ke” in depot injections

With oil depots, elimination from blood can be faster than release from the depot. In that case, the observed half‑life is governed by the slower process (“flip‑flop kinetics”). The calculator captures this by setting ke high and letting ka control the tail.

Route differences (IM vs SC)

The calculator assumes a depot-like release profile; real-life curves can differ with injection route, site, oil, needle depth, and individual blood flow. Reviews discuss feasibility and PK differences for subcutaneous administration. citeturn8search3

Lab timing & steady state (what guidelines say)

Guidelines matter because the same dose can look “high” or “low” depending on when you draw blood.

Endocrine Society monitoring recommendations

Steady state

Any repeated dosing schedule needs time to stabilize. The calculator’s “steady state” note is based on the ester’s effective half-life (roughly 4–5 half-lives to settle for first-order systems).

IM vs SubQ: absorption differences

The simulator now includes an injection route selector. Intramuscular (IM) and subcutaneous (SubQ) injections both work clinically, but SubQ is often experienced as a slightly slower-release depot in day-to-day practice.

This route adjustment is intentionally conservative and educational. Real kinetics still vary by needle depth, site perfusion, oil viscosity, and individual tissue characteristics.

Estradiol science: aromatase, body fat, genetics, AI

Where estradiol comes from in men

Most estradiol in men is produced by aromatization of testosterone (and androstenedione) in peripheral tissues—especially adipose tissue. Aromatase is encoded by CYP19A1. citeturn1search5turn1search9

Body fat and obesity effects

Higher adiposity tends to increase aromatase expression/activity, which can shift the testosterone → estradiol balance. Reviews of obesity-related hypogonadism discuss altered sex steroid levels (including estradiol). citeturn1search2turn1search9

Reference ranges and assay differences

Why “too low” estradiol can be a problem

Rare aromatase deficiency cases show undetectable estradiol with skeletal consequences, and estradiol replacement improves bone parameters—evidence that estradiol matters in male physiology. citeturn10search12turn10search8

Aromatase inhibitors (AI): benefits and risks

AIs reduce aromatization (lowering estradiol and often raising gonadotropins/testosterone in some contexts), but they can affect bone metabolism. Reviews in men discuss these tradeoffs. citeturn10search1turn10search9

The calculator’s AI control is intentionally a multiplier, not a dosing engine. Real AI response varies by drug, dose, metabolism, and baseline estradiol—so dosing should be clinician-guided with follow-up labs.

Why the calculator emphasizes the green zone

Aromatase converts androgens into estradiol continuously. In TRT planning, the goal is usually not to "crush" E2 or let it run unchecked, but to keep most of the curve inside a clinically reasonable symptom-compatible band (the chart's green zone).

Enhanced compounds (Primo, Mast, EQ)

The TRT++ panel adds optional adjunct compounds to support scenario testing. These are simplified modifiers, not prescribing tools.

These effects are intentionally conservative and heuristic. Use this panel for directional "what-if" exploration only, and confirm any real-world decisions with clinician-guided labs.

hCG science (what evidence supports)

Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) acts at the LH receptor and can stimulate Leydig-cell testosterone production. In controlled studies, relatively low-dose hCG helped maintain intratesticular testosterone in healthy men whose gonadotropins were suppressed by exogenous testosterone. citeturn11search0turn11search10

Why the calculator models hCG as a small “boost”: it’s aiming to represent the direction of effect (more LH-receptor stimulation → more endogenous contribution), not to reproduce full reproductive endocrinology.

Limitations & how to use this safely

Do not use this tool to self-prescribe or change medication without a clinician. It is an educational model. The best use is: propose a hypothesis → confirm with labs → iterate with supervision.

What the model does NOT capture

About the shaded bands

The charts include a +/-15% model range band around the central trajectory to discourage false precision. It is a visual uncertainty aid, not a formal confidence interval derived from patient-level variance data.

Best practice workflow

  1. Pick a dosing plan with a clinician.
  2. Wait long enough for a stable pattern (weeks; longer for very long esters).
  3. Draw labs at the guideline-recommended time (mid-interval for cyp/enan; trough for TU). citeturn12view0turn4view3
  4. Use calibration to anchor the model to your measured response.
  5. Only then use the simulator to explore “what-if” changes (mainly frequency changes and expected smoothing).

References

These sources were selected for guideline authority, primary literature, or reputable lab/medical documentation.

  1. Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline (2018): monitoring for enanthate/cypionate mid-interval and undecanoate trough timing. Oxford Academic (JCEM)
  2. DailyMed / labeling: testosterone cypionate IM half-life ~8 days. DailyMed PDF  |  Pfizer label
  3. Injectable testosterone undecanoate half-life depends on oil vehicle (tea seed vs castor oil). Phase I studies (PDF)
  4. Lab reference interval example (adult male estradiol 8–35 pg/mL, LC/MS/MS). Labcorp expected values
  5. Estradiol testing by LC‑MS/MS (method overview). Mayo Clinic Laboratories
  6. Aromatase gene (CYP19A1) and expression in adipose tissue. MedlinePlus Genetics  |  Review (PMC)
  7. hCG and intratesticular testosterone under testosterone-induced gonadotropin suppression (primary study + related dose-response). JCEM 2005  |  JCEM 2010
  8. Aromatase deficiency in men and estradiol replacement effects on bone (primary/clinical). JCEM 2000  |  Long follow-up report
  9. Aromatase inhibitors and bone considerations (review/perspective). Review (AIs in men)  |  JCEM bone loss perspective

If you want this explainer to link back into your calculator build more tightly (same theme, same navigation, or embedded inside the app), place this file next to index.html and keep the “Open simulator” link as-is.

© trt.ge. This page is purely informational and should not be treated as medical advice.